Introduction

It is worth noting that abortion laws have always been at the forefront, especially when based on the ethical morals laid on women’s decisions when there is an invasion of unwanted pregnancy. However, abortion can be justified if human health has disparities. Women living in poverty-stricken areas have low access to the abortion plan due to the tightened anti-abortion regulations, which is in line with the closure of several clinics across most countries recently (Watson, 2022). This depicts that as compared to rich countries, developing countries might not have the necessary facilities by which abortion can be done, including reaching the abortion providers; hence this is one of the ways that restrict abortion in these areas besides the set down laws. As a result, countries that have laws restricting abortion have fewer cases of abortion as there is less influence in performing the act as compared to countries where abortion is openly allowed.

This paper identifies the cultural and ethical perspectives related to the thesis statement. The level one cultural question entails the impact of cultural values on abortion rates? The level two cultural question is what cultural values are linked to the laws restricting abortion. On the other hand, the ethical level one question entails what ethical obstacles influence how the health sector addresses abortion. In contrast, the level two question is about what ethical issues medical personnel encounters in reducing abortion, especially in places where laws make the abortion act harder.

Cultural perspective